Sat 2-3-18
Subj: Losing a $1,000
Bet
After my
accident last January which subsequently forced me to relinquish my place in
the 2017 Certified Financial Planning (CFP) program at Oakland University which
started last February, I spent the year with two main objectives – 1) Recover
from my injury, 2) Make further preparations to enter the CFP. The director of the OU program had told me
last February that, despite my MBA and 37 years of financial management
experience, I was not qualified to enter their program and should pursue my
studies at an institution that offered an online self-paced option. I was really quite put off by this in view of
our previous discussions that if I completed the mentorship program which I did
from May through September 2016 and then completed a subsequent internship,
that I would then be sufficiently qualified.
Having
completed those requirements with the exception that my mentor had not yet
lined me up with an internship, it was with some disappointment and no small
amount of disgust to learn that I was still deemed unqualified. The second big shock came in April when I
contacted my mentor to resurrect the search for an internship only to be told
that he was leaving the program, leaving Michigan, and leaving his firm of 35
years to pursue “a new chapter in my life” (presumed translation: retirement)
in Florida and would no longer be available either to work with me or even
advise me.
Speak of
feeling completely betrayed and abandoned.
I was genuinely counting on OU and that internship program to jumpstart
my new career given the difficulties with age discrimination. I was very much counting on OU to be able to
point me towards firms that were actually looking for candidates my age (as I
had been assured three years ago when I first became involved in the program)
rather than me randomly contacting firms, 100% of which would claim they did
not discriminate, 90% of which would discriminate. I was going to be spinning my wheels a lot
unless OU was willing to be an intermediary.
So being
advised to go to another institution did not go over at all well with me. I was no longer feeling at all favorable
towards OU, in fact very much put off by the fact that I could not get accurate
information from anybody there. I was
curious to talk to the director again to find out if I was still a candidate
for internship, though I strongly suspected the answer would be no and, even if
a yes, also suspected that I would just be given worthless leads without any
vetting. If that were the case, I would
be better off just going my own way.
*******************************************
Thus, by the
end of the year I had pretty much decided that I would not attempt to return to
Oakland University. I had done a
considerable amount of research regarding the online programs and though they
looked suitable enough, I was put off by the lack of support they offered. I am the kind of student who asks a lot of
questions. I was shocked to discover
that both of the online schools that OU had recommended had a limit of just three
15-minute phone calls for each course to instructors to ask questions. That was hardly adequate. Both in undergraduate and graduate I
routinely dropped in on my professors for 10 to 15 minutes before each class
session to shoot questions at them, which they were always very happy to
answer. This was in addition to
questions asked during class. And it was
this support system for having questions answered that put me on the Dean’s
List at BU and the top ten percent of my class at USC.
Perhaps for the online programs the material would
prove to be self-explanatory and the need for questions would not be as crucial
as I thought. Still there was something
about them that struck me as deficient so about three weeks ago I began
rethinking OU. After all, it would be
providing live instructors to whom I could ask questions and the support of 15
to 20 fellow students with whom I would be sharing the experience for the next
14 months.
It occurred to me a few weeks ago that it might
actually be quite a good investment just to take the first course in February
and March and see how it goes. After
all, my main concerns about the program being too intense or that I would find
out that I wasn’t good at this stuff or, more to the point, didn’t even like it
– all these could be answered very efficiently simply by taking the first
course, especially since this year the first course was investments. Though they did tell me last year that I
lacked experience, I was still under the impression that completing the mentor
program with a rave recommendation from my mentor solved that. I even had a letter from the mentor singing
my praises and stating his opinion that I would be a great success in the
14-month cohort.
To find out for sure,
it would cost $850 for the course and $150 for the textbooks. So a gamble of $1,000 could finally set my
mind at ease as to whether this was the right path for me. Best case scenario: it turns out not only to
be manageable but great and 14 months from now I become a Certified Financial
Planner. Worst case: it turns out
disastrously so for the thousand dollars I get to find out that I belong on a
different path; besides which I’ll also learn a lot about investments. Either way, I win. A thousand dollars is not a lot of money to
get the answers to these crucial questions.
Having made the decision, I actually for the first
time started feeling very excited about starting the investment class on
Wednesday. Sunday night I registered
online, paid the tuition and ordered the two textbooks. On Tuesday, I received a detailed syllabus
from the instructor along with the first assignment that would be due already
when we come to the first class session on Wednesday. As of Tuesday, there were 25 students registered
for the class. These were the 25 people
I’d be spending the next 14 months with.
It was going to be a good program this year.
*****************************************
I’ve mentioned that I spent five months in 2016
taking the introductory course from my mentor.
We covered two very large textbooks in that class which was basically a
condensed version of the entire 14 month program which itself is a condensed
version of the original two-year program.
It was fascinating and I loved every bit of it except that we were
covering 150-200 pages of technical material for each 45 minute session. This was very intense, there was only time
for one or two questions (when I had a dozen or more) and scarcely time to do
any more than the most superficial overview of the material. What’s more is that there was an exam at the
beginning of each session on the material that was assigned but not yet
covered. The exam was very detailed so
it was quite necessary to study all 200 pages very thoroughly to pass the exam;
and did I mention that we were under threat of expulsion if we failed two exams? Thus there was a certain amount of stress in
each session. (Now I know I need not have had any stress at
all for now I know it would have not made a bit of difference. They never had any intention of admitting me
to the program.)
But Tom, my mentor and instructor, was very amiable
towards me; I got the impression very quickly that he was only looking for
evidence of a commitment and that I would be passing as long as I was making an
effort. Besides, the only real objective
was to pass the course as a prerequisite for acceptance to the intern
program. I could tough it out for five
months to get into that program.
Tom also assured me that the regular academic
program would not be nearly as rigorous or intense, that we would be covering
far less material for each session, the sessions would be 3 hours long and
there would be ample time for questions.
Thus I was shocked last February when I signed up for the taxation class
only to receive a textbook that was 1600 pages long (plus 1200 more pages of
supplemental material) and a syllabus that had us covering about 300 pages per
week. Covering so much in so little
time, the instructor was also quite candid with me that there would be little
time for questions. It appeared I had
once again been given bum information.
The regular program was going to be even more intense than the
introductory course.
When on this past Tuesday I saw the preview of the investments
textbook and received the course syllabus, I was quite relieved. The book was only about 400 pages long and
per the syllabus we would be assigned about 40 pages per week. That seemed quite manageable. In the intro course, we were assigned between
100 and 200 problems to do for each session.
For this course, we were being assigned about 30 problems each week. That seemed entirely manageable.
******************************************
Then, on Wednesday, the tables were rather abruptly
turned. I received an email from the
program director who noted that she had seen my name on the registration list
and was now telling me in very direct language that I was not qualified for the
program. When I first inquired five
years ago, a high school diploma and working towards a bachelor’s was all that
was required for admission. Three years
ago they were now recommending (but not requiring) two years of experience in
the financial services industry for admission.
Two years ago it became more of a requirement but the intro course and
internship was touted as a suitable substitute for the two years of
experience. Last year they made clear
that they did not consider my successful completion of the intro course to be
adequate preparation; but they also said that there were students in the
program that also did not have experience and, though they were struggling much
harder than the professionals, they were at least allowed to be in and complete
the program.
Wednesday’s email from the director stated a very
different scenario. Now they are saying
that the candidates are expected to already have both insurance and stock broker’s
licenses. You are expected to already
know how to analyze and select securities for your clients. There is another item of curiosity in their
statement that “students are required to be active in the industry and planning
to challenge the CFP Examination.” I
don’t know what they mean by “challenge the exam” but the Financial
Planning Association of America, the national governing body that oversees all
the CFP curricula and credentialing, also uses that term but with a very specific
definition. To the FPA, “challenge”
means petitioning the FPA to demonstrate that you are soooo knowledgeable in
the topics that you can be excused from taking the national exam. Is that what the OU CFP has evolved into, a
program that will allow candidates to qualify to be exempted from taking the
national exam? Thus, I am being warned
that if I insist on joining the program and taking the investments class that
they will be watching me to see if I am able to keep up and, if they determine
I am not, they will be expelling me. No
refunds.
Needless to say, all the ill will I had been
feeling towards Oakland University throughout last year was now back with a
vengeance. On Wednesday I sent a letter
to the instructor pleading my case, summarizing my very extensive background in
finance, and asking him directly if I will be allowed to take his class. Since the director has already stated her
position, I doubt this instructor will go against it. He has not yet replied.
*******************************************
Given this rather untidy reception, I have decided
to withdraw from the program as I see no rationale for staying where I am not
wanted. So I have lost this thousand
dollar bet as I will not be getting an answer to my concerns about whether I
belong in this profession. However, all
is not lost. I will be getting a refund
of the $850 tuition and I could also be getting a refund for the textbooks
except that, for the relatively modest $150 investment, I think I will keep the
textbooks. I have the course syllabus; I
can teach myself the course. I think by
the time I finish with these books I will know whether this is what I want to
do.
Instead of gambling a thousand dollars, I will only
be gambling $150 dollars. If the answer
is yes (and I very much suspect it will be), the online courses are suddenly
looking much better. In fact Boston
University has a CFP program that is only $800 dollars more than OU, offers the
option of both online study and to Skype live classes, you get four months to
complete each course (though since it is self-paced, you can complete them
sooner), access to instructors for asking questions, and a database of
thousands of practice questions to help prepare for the national exam. The American College also has an impressive
program but it is about $1500 more than BU.
************************************************
I’m no longer waiting on Oakland. I’m taking the bull by the horns and moving
forward. So these past couple of days
I’ve formulated a new plan. First, take
the next couple months to teach myself the investments course. If that goes well, I will immediately sign up
to take the online IRS courses to become a tax preparer. There are three courses, each requires about
70 hours of online study after which you go to a testing center to complete a
3-hour exam. You can take all three
courses at once or one at a time. Once
I’ve completed the three courses and three exams, I will start work as a tax
preparer whilst I begin the online CFP.
Two years as a tax preparer is considered eligible
experience for receiving the CFP credential.
Taxes are something I’m very comfortable with. It is a rules-based profession where you are
applying the book to client problems, calculating the numbers and entering them
onto spreadsheets and forms. This is
what I did for 8 years as a financial analyst in aerospace. This is what I have done for 37 years
managing finances in my other enterprises.
After that, there are any number of additional
online tax courses and finance licenses I can test for to elevate my expertise
and qualify for even better professional positions. OU has done me a considerable service by
kicking me to the curb where I must now go off on my own, something I probably
should have done three years ago except that I had no idea that they would not
deliver on a single promise they had made.
And this business of needing both a license to sell
insurance and a stock broker’s license just to be admitted to the CFP is really
quite ridiculous. What is the point of
the classes if you’re expected to already know all this stuff? I know a ton of financial professionals and
nearly all of them have one or the other but very few have both. If you’re going to be an insurance agent, why
would you need a stock broker’s license?
If you’re going to sell stocks, why would you need an insurance
license? This is just another example of
OU feeding me bum information.
But I don’t regret it. I learned a ton from Tom in the intro course
and because of the accident I really wasn’t in a position to do much of
anything last year anyway. I will run
with this under my own power and I may even get there in better shape than the
OU route. As for the age discrimination,
I’m going to deal with that the same way I have dealt with every other
challenge in my lifetime. You put one
foot in front of the other and just keep going until you accomplish the
objective.
The OU program begins Wednesday. Wouldn’t it be interesting if I manage to
complete my studies before they wrap up in March of next year? It will be one step at a time.
Addendum: Sunday
2-4-18
I have now received
the email from the investments course instructor. It was very amiably worded but as I suspected
he took the same position as the director.
The final line said it all: “It
is advised that you do not take this program as you do not meet the
requirements.” Boston, here I come!
No comments:
Post a Comment